Friday, December 26, 2014

Room at the Inn?

Fr. Dan's sermon for Christmas focused on Luke's comment "there was no room for them" in the inn. Lk 2:7.

Why, he asked, was (and is) there no room for Christ in the inn?

First, because it was already occupied with other guests. There simply was no room. Others were there before, and the innkeeper didn't think to disturb them.

Second, the innkeeper didn't appreciate who his new guests were. He was unaware of their importance.

Third, the innkeeper wasn't willing to rearrange things in the inn to make room.Why should he? The inn was full and who were these people to put him out?

Fr. Dan invited us to ponder how we respond to Christ at our door. For, as Revelation says, "Here I stand, knocking at the door. If anyone hears me calling and opens the door I will enter his house and I will have supper with him And he with me." Rev. 3:20.




Saturday, December 20, 2014

A Quiet Voice

Life's disappointments tax our faith in God's plan. And the temptation is to let our faith lapse and say to ourselves, "Since I don't know I won't believe. Since I can't see I won't hope."

In my case, in that temptation I heard a small voice saying to me, "Stay with the plan. You will gain all, including all that you think you have lost, all that you hope for, and even more, if you persevere."

In this season of waiting, I am trying to place my trust in that surprising, most welcome quiet voice.  It struck me that it is like the Lord's promise to David in the first reading from this 3rd Sunday of Advent (2 Samuel 7).  The Lord responds to David's wish to build Him a permanent house by promising to establish for David a house and kingdom that "shall endure forever before me", a promise far greater than David could ever have imagined.

The quote from St. Vincent de Paul offered in my commentary (Living with Christ) reinforces the point: "Surely the great secret of the spiritual life is to abandon to God all that we love by abandoning ourselves to all that God wishes, in perfect confidence that all will be for the best; and hence it has been said that all things turn to good for those who serve God."

What a gift is the Lord's promise in response to my fiat! In His economy, sacrificing my will for His will reap unimagined blessings.  I will try to cradle the Lord's promise in my heart this Christmas season.  A happy new year is sure to follow its birth in me!




Tuesday, December 16, 2014

I Agree Differently

The ways to be one with God are the spiritual practices of prayer, almsgiving and fasting. As we persist in these practices we turn more and more to God, we become more and more aware of our errors, our sinfulness, and become more and more like little Christs. Through these practices we clear out that space in us that God created for his residence. We clear out all the attachments and addictions and false selves we accumulate during our finite existence and make space for the visions of the infinite life that Christ promises to his faithful.

Thursday, December 11, 2014

A Good Offense and a Good Defense in the Spiritual Battle

Our homilist today commented on today's gospel statement (Mt.11:11) that "the Kingdom of heaven suffers violence, and the violent are taking it by force."  He said that we need a good offense and a good defense to enter into effective combat.

The defense, he said is penance, the offense, mortification.  These are the two basic elements in conversion.  Penance involves saying "I'm sorry," asking for forgiveness, and, most importantly, cleaning up the mess, the collateral damage that sin causes.  Mortification entails preparing oneself not to sin again.  Prayer, fasting and almsgiving are the main components of mortification.  By these means we keep the end (our death and judgment) in mind, and access the strength of grace against our proclivity to sin again.

So there is a force of good that we can invoke against the violence of the dark powers directed against the kingdom: Penance and Mortification. Let's use it!


Thursday, December 4, 2014

Advent

To wait for... to hope for ... to anticipate. Not to act, for it is not our doing, this thing we await.  Patience! Quiet! Rest your hands. Sit and in silence ... watch and listen.

Monday, October 27, 2014

Thank You

Why is it, close to my birthday, I want to give You a present, not receive one, since I have already received from You what I can only praise You for giving me, your presence on this day and on every day that I live? And so I do give you my present, myself, in thanks to You, in praise of You, who gave me myself.


Monday, September 29, 2014

Magnus es, Domine, et laudabilis valde

So begins the Confessions of St. Augustine.  According to Jean Luc Marion, the archetypical creaturely action is praise, praise of our creator.  Man, a being who is "tilted" toward God, doesn't regain stature until he rests (leans) against God. Let us praise Him.

O God beyond all praising,
we worship you today
and sing the love amazing
that songs cannot repay;
for we can only wonder
at every gift you send,
at blessings without number
and mercies without end:
We lift our hearts before you
and wait upon your word,
we honor and adore you,
our great and mighty Lord.
(Instrumental)
Then hear, O gracious Savior,
accept the love we bring,
that we who know your favor
may serve you as our king;
and whether our tomorrows
be filled with good or ill,
we’ll triumph through our sorrows
and rise to bless you still:
We lift our hearts before you
and wait upon your word,
we honor and adore you,
our great and mighty Lord.

Friday, September 12, 2014

Does Anything Ever Change?

After reading the following passage from Isaiah I asked myself, "How can I possible comply with the the requirement ' not to hear of bloodshed' or 'not to look on evil'?" 
Isaiah 33:15-16
Whoever walks righteously and speaks honestly,
Who spurns what is gained by 0ppression,
Who waves off contact with a bribe,
Who stops his ears so as not to hear of bloodshed,
Who closes his eyes so as not to look on evil,
That one shall dwell on the heights …
Even if we can be righteous, spurn ill-gotten gains and refuse bribes, who among us can be free of the sound of bloodshed and the visions of evil around us?
Even Jeremiah could not follow Isaiah’s prescription to “dwell on the heights”.

Today’s Canticle from morning prayer, 
Jeremiah 14:17-21

Speak to them this word:
Let my eyes stream with tears night and day, without rest,
Over the great destruction which overwhelms the virgin daughter of my people over her incurable wound.
If I walk out into the field, look! those slain by the sword;
If I enter the city, look! victims of famine.
Both prophet and priest ply their trade in a land they do not know.
Have you really cast Judah off?
Is Zion loathsome to you?
Why have you struck us a blow that cannot be healed?
We wait for peace, to no avail;
For a time of healing,
But terror comes instead.

 But he does not leave us without a remedy for our woes.

He advises admission of our offenses ---

We recognize our wickedness, LORD, the guilt of our ancestors:
we have sinned against you.

and calls on God for mercy ---

Do not reject us, for your name’s sake,
Do not disgrace your glorious throne.
Remember! Do not break your covenant with us.

and recognizes the greatness of the Lord ---

Among the idols of the nations are there any that give rain?
Or can the mere heavens send showers?
Is it not you, LORD, our God, to whom we look? 
You alone do all these things.

Monday, September 1, 2014

GSP - Gross Spiritual Product

Celebration of Discipline is a book written by Richard J. Foster. Since it was recommended to me I have come to learn that it is quite a popular text on Christian spirituality. This is the second book that I've read by this author. Some of the sources for his work were somewhat new to me. One of those sources is a man named D. Elton Trueblood. Like Richard Foster, Elton Trueblood was a Quaker and a theologian.

Following is a quotation from the introduction to Celebration of Discipline written by Elton Trueblood. It speaks to our current cultural condition in which happiness and prosperity are measured by the size of your paycheck and the amount of goods that you consume.

D. Elton Trueblood

‘A genuine cultural Revolution would ensue if considerable numbers were to obey the trenchant command, “De-accumulate.”

The greatest problems of our time are not technological, for these we handle fairly well. They are not even political or economic, because the difficulties in these areas, glaring as they may be, are largely derivative. The greatest problems are moral and spiritual, and unless we can make some progress in these realms, we may not even survive. This is how advanced cultures have declined in the past.'

Thursday, August 21, 2014

The Meaning of An Acorn

We spend most of our childhood anticipating, desiring and certain of the ultimate value of growing up. We don’t want to be kids. Despite this all consuming desire to be an adult, I’m not certain I ever got there.

As evidence of this theory, after my wife and I were married and before we had children, I felt compelled to construct a kite. I bought the lumber and the plastic and constructed an eight foot high kite. I flew it and if I was not such a large guy it would have lifted me off the ground.

Fast forward to today. This spring I planted some acorns. I gathered them last fall and kept them in a plastic bag in the refrigerator all winter. I planted them in the spring. When the first acorn sprouted a sapling I was elated.

I began this endeavor so that I could give each of my grandkids an oak tree to plant and in twenty or thirty years they could look at that tree and recollect that their gramps had given it to them. This was my shot at immortality or at least an extended remembrance of my presence in the life of my grandkids.

I knew nothing of the way an oak tree grew. Leaves emerged from the sprout. Soon after, from the center of the stem, a new set of leaves was born, fresh, new unblemished filled with the splendor of newness.

The thing is - these little child trees were difficult to give away.  I grew seven or eight so it was not too difficult. I would still have three or four for myself. Yet, I began to wonder why they intrigued me so. I would visit my trees frequently and experienced a good deal of satisfaction from seeing the extension of the tree trunk, small and thin as it was, coming out of the center of the stem, with new, unblemished leaves, light green to a reddish hue, each fresh - a reminder of the excitement of new life.

On reflection it occurred to me that my fascination with these saplings had a more transcendent significance. The new emergence of another layer of growth and new leafs reminded me of our spiritual growth. Each effort at being a little Christ that we make is the emergence of new growth. Awareness of our weaknesses and self concerns is a new growth in the Spirit. It is the emergence of a life in Christ that produces an unblemished, fresh and new growth. Nature mimics the Spirit. Praise God!

Tuesday, July 22, 2014

Let the children come.



And you taught your people, by these deeds,
that those who are just must be kind;

These words from the Sunday readings (Wis. 16-19) stuck in my mind when I read them. I immediately connected them to the current crisis at our borders, the influx of children from Central American countries. I guess this issue has stuck in my craw recently.

The news stories and video clips of outraged American who vehemently oppose the entry of these children do offer some valid reasons for their opinions. The disorderly way in which their entry is accomplished certainly is a disgrace. One would think a well-organized government with ample warning would have better planned for this event. It is embarrassing for the wealthiest country in the world to be so ill prepared.

Some objections include the possibility of introducing disease, the concern that some of these children may be criminals or gang members and the possibility that in such a large and disorganized movement of people there may be those who wish to do harm to the United States. To those who are more compassionate and less cynical these objections may seem to be grasps at straws, but a rational mind could find them reasonable.

The children pass through our neighbor, the country of Mexico. Mexico is complicit in this migration of children, yet, no word is heard from them nor any assistance offered. Neither do we hear from our diplomatic officials any request that Mexico take some responsibility for the safety and care of the children on this purportedly dangerous journey and the slipshod way in which they travel through Mexico. I think Americans are right to be upset by countries that seek and benefit from United States economic aid and supportive trade policies and in turn offer a blind eye.

And you taught your people, by these deeds,
that those who are just must be kind;

Notwithstanding the above considerations there are reasons why the United States should gladly accept the children into our country. The Central American countries from which these children are fleeing are losing their most valuable assets, their children. These children represent for these countries their best hope for a brighter future. Rather than looking to the future of their countries, their leadership prefers the selfish and short term gains they acquire by shipping their children north. Their loss could be our gain.

The penchant for shortsightedness is not an attribute solely confined to the Central American countries. We in the United States suffer from the same disease. We are concerned with the sacrifices we may have to make in order to provide food and medical care and education to all these children. We fear the increased costs to our welfare system by introducing more people without jobs into a population in which there already are millions without jobs. We fear the lawlessness characteristic of the way in which the children are entering the country will turn into a lawlessness when they are eventually integrated into our culture. 

These are all sacrifices that would have to be endured by accepting the children. Yet we pay little attention to the fact that having children and educating children is the greatest thing we can do to assure a secure future and a continued success of the great American experiment.

We prefer instead to focus on issues like equal pay for women, equal rights for those of different sexual persuasions and investment in alternative energy sources. We consider education to be important, but the issue to which the most attention is given is the compensation given to teachers and the pensions provided them when they retire. These are important issues. They pale in comparison however to the fact that the American middle class has a birth rate barely at replacement levels. Many of our young adults consider marriage and having children to be a burden. They consider this to be something they may do once they are through enjoying life. Some married couples may even consider having a child as just another acquisition along with a home in the suburbs and two rather sporty cars in the driveway. I hope I'm not being too hard on us.

We take the greatest gift given to us by God, our ability to co-create with him, and we turned it into a burden or some mechanical process that allows us to acquire a possession. We fail to see in children the hope for the future that they embody. This applies to all children, not just children born of Americans or South Americans or Central Americans. Sure, it may take a generation or two in order for a child to bear fruit for the society in which they live. But can there be any more fruitful investment that can be made for the future of our country and the culture of freedom it has produced in the last 250 years. So I say let the children come. 

 And you taught your people, by these deeds,
that those who are just must be kind;

Monday, May 26, 2014

From the May issue of  First Things an opinion piece by Charles J. Chaput used the following quote from Ben Franklin. I thought it spoke to our current experiences of government.

In 1787, at the age of eighty-one, Benjamin Franklin addressed the Constitutional Convention: “I have lived, Sir, a long time, and the longer I live, the more convincing proofs I see of this truth: that God governs in the affairs of men. And if a sparrow cannot fall to the ground without his notice, is it probable that an empire can rise without his aid? We have been assured, Sir, in the sacred writings, that ‘except the Lord build the House, they labor in vain that build it.’ I firmly believe this; and I also believe that without his concurring aid, we shall succeed in this political building no better than the builders of Babel: We shall be divided by our little, partial, local interests, our projects will be confounded, and we ourselves shall become a reproach and byword down to future ages.”

Thursday, May 22, 2014

The Joy of Evangelization

Continuing on with the temptations faced by pastoral workers, Pope Francis sees in the true Christian spirit a joy and a fulfillment that results from being a part of community and reveling in the goodness of others and in praying for our enemies. This gift can only be had by putting away "enmity, division, calumny, defamation, vendetta, jealousy and the desire to impose certain ideas at all costs."


No to warring among ourselves
98. How many wars take place within the people of God and in our different communities! In our neighbourhoods and in the workplace, how many wars are caused by envy and jealousy, even among Christians! Spiritual worldliness leads some Christians to war with other Christians who stand in the way of their quest for power, prestige, pleasure and economic security. Some are even no longer content to live as part of the greater Church community but stoke a spirit of exclusivity, creating an “inner circle”. Instead of belonging to the whole Church in all its rich variety, they belong to this or that group which thinks itself different or special.

99. Our world is being torn apart by wars and violence, and wounded by a widespread individualism which divides human beings, setting them against one another as they pursue their own well-being. In various countries, conflicts and old divisions from the past are re-emerging. I especially ask Christians in communities throughout the world to offer a radiant and attractive witness of fraternal communion. Let everyone admire how you care for one another, and how you encourage and accompany one another: “By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another” (Jn 13:35). This was Jesus’ heartfelt prayer to the Father: “That they may all be one... in us... so that the world may believe” (Jn 17:21). Beware of the temptation of jealousy! We are all in the same boat and headed to the same port! Let us ask for the grace to rejoice in the gifts of each, which belong to all.

100. Those wounded by historical divisions find it difficult to accept our invitation to forgiveness and reconciliation, since they think that we are ignoring their pain or are asking them to give up their memory and ideals. But if they see the witness of authentically fraternal and reconciled communities, they will find that witness luminous and attractive. It always pains me greatly to discover how some Christian communities, and even consecrated persons, can tolerate different forms of enmity, division, calumny, defamation, vendetta, jealousy and the desire to impose certain ideas at all costs, even to persecutions which appear as veritable witch hunts. Whom are we going to evangelize if this is the way we act?
101. Let us ask the Lord to help us understand the law of love. How good it is to have this law! How much good it does us to love one another, in spite of everything. Yes, in spite of everything! Saint Paul’s exhortation is directed to each of us, "Do not be overcome by evil, but overcome evil with good” (Rom 12:21). And again: “Let us not grow weary in doing what is right” (Gal 6:9). We all have our likes and dislikes, and perhaps at this very moment we are angry with someone. At least let us say to the Lord: “Lord, I am angry with this person, with that person. I pray to you for him and for her”. To pray for a person with whom I am irritated is a beautiful step forward in love, and an act of evangelization. Let us do it today! Let us not allow ourselves to be robbed of the ideal of fraternal love!

Wednesday, May 14, 2014

Blaise Pascal Part 3

Finally we come to what Pascal meant by the "iodine of hyperactivity". We flit from one diversion to another so as not to be alone in the presence of our thoughts. For our Dante reading group I've included the author's tip of the hat to Dante.

Oakes continues:

... Pascal was an acute student of boredom, and saw in this phenomenon… the clue to the very pathos of the human condition. Generally speaking, says Pascal, “we think either of present woes or of threatened miseries.” But moments occur in almost everyone’s experience when life reaches a temporary pause of homeostasis, when we feel quite safe on every side, when bad health does not threaten, when bill collectors are not baying at the door, when rush “hour traffic is light and the weather pleasant.” But precisely at such moments “boredom on its own account emerges from the depths of our hearts, where it is naturally rooted, and poisons our whole mind.” Not just the king craves diversion. So terrified are we of boredom that the king’s ambition is our own.

I have called Pascal “the first modern Christian” because, among other reasons, our civilization, in contrast to all other past civilizations, gets its very identity from the sheer range of distractions that have now been made available to us, from hundreds of channels on cable TV to over a thousand video cassettes on the shelf of any self-respecting video rental agency to the millions of websites on the Internet, group activities of every sort imaginable, aerobics classes, talk-show radio on the air twenty-four hours a day, and so on....

 Our own age is not likely to be distinguished in history for the large numbers of people who insisted on finding the time to think. Plainly, this is not the Age of Meditative Man . . . . Substitutes for repose are a billion dollar business. Almost daily, new antidotes for contemplation spring into being and leap out from store counters. Silence, already the world’s most critical shortage, is in danger of becoming a nasty word. Modern man may or may not be obsolete, but he is certainly wired for sound and he twitches as naturally as he breathes.

Of course no one denies the legitimate need for entertainment or the role that diversion plays in generating demand for the works of art that have become the glory of our species. Often life achieves its goal of testifying to its own goodness as worth living when a human being is able to enjoy the highest benefits of culture. I personally count myself most glad to be alive when I am enjoying a good meal with a friend, listening to Mozart in the privacy of my room, or reading a good book. Nor, despite his seeming Jansenist severity, would Pascal contemn such pleasures. Even he, the least therapeutic writer imaginable, admits that diversions can help to heal the beset soul ….
  

But our extraordinary obsession with entertainment and distraction constitutes perhaps the hallmark of our civilization in contrast to past cultures. From the time the clock radio goes off in the morning to the late-night talk shows, the average denizen of contemporary culture need never be alone, encounter silence, or have to listen to the voice within. As Pascal says: “We run heedlessly into the abyss after putting something in front of us to keep from seeing the precipice.” ….

Second only to Dante, Pascal is Europe’s most politically incorrect writer. He dares to raise the unmentionable topic of truth in religion, and even called one of the sections of his Pensées “Nature Is Corrupt: On the Falseness of Other Religions.” In contrast to most reflection on the problem of world religions in today’s academy, Pascal sees the “problem” as in fact essential for the truth of the Christian message:
 That God wanted to be hidden . If there were only one religion, God would be clearly manifest. If there were martyrs only in our religion, the same. God being therefore hidden, any religion which does not say that God is hidden is not true. And any religion which does not give us the reason why does not enlighten. Ours does all this . . . . If there were no obscurity man would not feel his corruption: if there were no light man could not hope for a cure. Thus it is not only right but useful that God should be partly concealed and partly revealed, since it is equally dangerous for man to know God without knowing his wretchedness as to know his own wretchedness without knowing God. “Truly God is hidden with you” (Isaiah 45:15).

Blaise Pascal Part 2


I thought I could lay out Pascal's thought in two posts but it is not possible. The following is then the second installment exerpted from the First Things article by Edward T. Oakes. the entire article can be found at http://www.firstthings.com/article/1999/08/pascal-the-first-modern-christian.

Continuing on from the previous post:

Pride tells us we can know God without Jesus Christ, in effect that we can communicate with God without a mediator. But this only means that we are communicating with a God who is the [prideful] result that comes from being known without a mediator. Whereas those who have known God through a mediator know their own wretchedness. Not only is it impossible to know God without Jesus Christ, it is also useless . . . . [For] knowing God without knowing our wretchedness leads to pride. Knowing our wretchedness without knowing God leads to despair. Knowing Jesus Christ is the middle course, because in Him we find both God and our wretchedness.
  
Because he wants the Incarnation to be a cure appropriate to the disease and because the death of Christ on the cross is indeed a most radical cure, implying a serious illness, Pascal is usually categorized as a “pessimistic” thinker” he wants his readers to see how far advanced the disease infecting them really is. And certainly he can be unsparing in his portrayal of the fleshly corruption and frail constitution of that “bruised and crushed reed” that is the human body…. But in depicting human wretchedness Pascal never wallows in scenes of grim despair but simply faces the human condition as it is, universally. In fact … the real issue comes down not to the sheer immensity of human suffering but more crucially to the fact that human suffering only has to occur once for the issue of man’s predicament to be raised.
  
…. What Pascal would say, in other words, is that as long as we take the spectator’s part and view human suffering from the outside, then, no matter how happy our circumstances are at the moment, we must know ourselves fundamentally as wretched beings. “Imagine a number of men in chains, all under sentence of death, …some of whom are each day butchered in the sight of the others; those remaining see their own condition in that of their fellows, and looking at each other with grief and despair await their turn. This is an image of the human condition.”
  
Especially in this era of terrorists parading their hostages in front of the world’s television screens, or hijackers holding a pistol to the head of an airline pilot for all the world to behold, or high school students hiding under cafeteria tables while their friends are being murdered by their own peers, we immediately recognize the truth of what Pascal is saying. But Pascal does not intend to force his readers to wallow in this misery. Rather, his depiction of the human condition is meant only to create the first opening through which we hear God’s response to that misery. … Pascal firmly believed that “God owes us nothing” …. And yet … God’s answer is not nothing. But that answer cannot even be heard if we do not admit the realities of the human condition in all their bleakness. Even as spectators, we suffer what we are forced to see. Television screens force us to become spectators of appalling suffering, but the situation they reveal is rooted in everyone’s nature. There is no escape from its pathos, only balm for our wounds if we are willing to accept the astringency of the ointment.
  
Of course, not many want that kind of painful healing, making it well “nigh inevitable that we will avail ourselves of distractions from our woes". Few words, in fact, are more crucial to Pascal than divertissement , usually translated as “diversion” or “distraction.” One of Pascal’s most famous observations, found in nearly every anthology of quotations, holds that “all the misfortunes of men derive from one single thing, their inability to remain at repose in a room.” …Pascal’s remark actually forms the opening gambit of his Christian apologetics, for he knows that “being unable to cure death, wretchedness, and ignorance,” and being not too fond of the medicine of Christ on offer either, “men have decided, in order to be happy, not to think about such things.” “Pessimist” that he is, however, Pascal refuses to let us evade God’s answer to our plight just because we would rather not advert to our distress in the first place. “That is why men are so fond of hustle and bustle,” he says. “That is why prison is such a fearful punishment; that is why the pleasures of solitude are so incomprehensible.”
  
This craving for distraction is so overriding and exigent that for Pascal it actually constitutes the driving force of ambition…. We crave distractions because we do not want to face the realities of the human condition. And because we are unwilling to admit our despair, we perforce cannot face the thought of applying the appropriate balm to heal these unacknowledged wounds. Consequently we hurl ourselves into an endless round of diversions, jobs, hobbies, etc., all to avoid our nature as thinking reeds:
   "Man is obviously made for thinking. Therein lies all his dignity and his merit; and his whole duty is to think as he ought. Now the order of thought is to begin with ourselves, and with our Author and our end. But what does the world think about? Never about that, but about dancing, playing the lute, singing, writing verse, jousting and fighting, becoming a king, without ever thinking what it means to be a king or to be a man."





Saturday, May 10, 2014

Blaise Pascal

Blaise Pascal
The Church established by Jesus is commissioned by Christ to faithfully pass on the doctrines of the faith. The number of cultures, ethnicities and languages in which this task is accomplished is overwhelming.  Local cultures and varying degrees of orthodoxy ensure that each Catholic is educated in these doctrines in various ways using culturally meaningful metaphors and with varying degrees of thoroughness.
To a large extent my spiritual journey consists of seeking presentations of doctrine that provide me with a unique understanding or strike me as especially meaningful. That was the case when I read an article in the magazine First Things on Blaise Pascal. The article was one in a series highlighting one individual from each century of the last millennium who most significantly defined the last millennium. The following link is to the entire article.
 ( http://www.firstthings.com/article/1999/08/pascal-the-first-modern-christian)

The author of the article, Edward T. Oakes, outlines Pascal's presentation of Christ's incarnation in Pascal's collected musings entiltled Pensees. Pascal's way of explaining the Incarnation and how it can work in our lives refreshed my view of a doctrine that I confess to at least once a week, but one which I fail to reflect upon as deeply as I should.

In the article Oakes uses a term "iodine of  hyperactivity". I don't know if it is his or Pascal's but my next post will expand on that concept. Oakes contrasts Pascal's thought (theological) against Descartes (reason) so you will see him mentioned.

from Oakes' article:

But Pascal is even more noticeably anti-Cartesian in his concern for the Christian religion. Descartes famously loathed theological disputes and avoided their entanglements whenever possible. Pascal, as his acrimonious debates with the Jesuits attest, entered the fray of theological infighting with startling gusto and vehemence. But what most of his contemporaries, both friend and foe, failed during his lifetime to see about his motivation emerged only after his death, when his younger sister gathered together the shards and disjecta membra of his notes for a projected work of apologetics and published them in the form we know today as the Pensées .
  
From this remarkable work [Pensees] we now realize that Pascal saw himself, above all, as Christ’s apologete and defender against Christianity’s rationalist scoffers. … No doubt Pascal always remained heavily indebted to Descartes’ dualism of mind and matter, but in his apologetics for Christianity he transforms Cartesian dualism into merely one aspect of a much deeper and more central dualism: not between spirit and matter but between God’s holiness and human misery, not between soul and body but between God’s infinity and man’s sin. Christ came to heal these more agonizing divisions -- divisions rooted not in incompatible metaphysical essences but in the pathos of the enfleshed soul trapped in sin. The Incarnation thus becomes a balm applied to man’s riven soul, torn not so much between spirit and flesh as between despair and pride.

 [The Christian religion] teaches men both these truths: that there is a God of whom we are capable, and that a corruption in our nature makes us unworthy of Him. It is equally important for us to know both these points; for it is equally dangerous for man to know God without knowing his own wretchedness, and to know his wretchedness without knowing the Redeemer who can cure him of it. Knowledge of only one of these points leads either to the arrogance of the philosophers, who have known God and not their own wretchedness, or to the despair of the atheists, who know their wretchedness without knowing the Redeemer.

We can see from these remarks that for Pascal Descartes’ dualism is missing a crucial element: he has failed to provide an analysis of the moral dangers to which the human spirit is prone precisely because of its capacity for an infinite reach to the very ends of the universe. Pascal openly affirms with Descartes that our capacity to know the universe makes us masters, in some paradoxical sense, of the universe we conceive. But our capacity to “grasp” the universe and transform it into a mental construct of our knowing powers remains both paradox and pathos: we always accomplish these acts of knowing as puny, pathetic, and vulnerable bodies, whose corruption eventually leads to death.

This knowing mind, however, would rather remain enamored of its cognitive powers than acknowledge that this knowing power is an organic function of the brain. … Fearing the inevitable dissolution of its powers, the mind hides from itself the reality of its own insignificance. Second only to cognition itself, the most notable fact of the human mind lies in its tendency to forget the realities of its corruption and death.

 Hence the central temptation of man is always pride. … For Pascal, pride is a deeply functional sin: it works to help us forget. The mind shrinks from recognizing its status as a thinking reed by hiding under a carapace of pride. Characteristically, Descartes failed to notice this pathos; a missing element that, like the non-barking dog that became the decisive clue in the Sherlock Holmes story, tells us why Cartesian philosophy is more culprit than detective, more likely, that is, to lead us astray than to bring us to the truth.

But despite a few stray remarks in the Pensées that attack Descartes, Pascal’s intent there is not, fundamentally, polemical. Throughout this fascinating book of almost random observations the reader soon picks up the author’s driving motivation. Pascal above all wants to explain to his post-Cartesian contemporaries how the pathos of human nature has its own “balm in Gilead,” a healing ointment in Jesus Christ, who is the very divine incarnation of these human oppositions. But of course Jesus Christ can only be accepted as Christ (the “anointed one”) if one first admits that human nature needs His healing balm. Christ’s coming on earth thus has the odd effect of eliciting hate precisely because His presence in history will reopen wounds that our distracted culture thought had been healed not by His balm but by the iodine of hyperactivity.
  
No wonder, then, that modernity since the Enlightenment has taken scandal in Jesus Christ. Even inside our own culture, which is often called “post”“modern because of its self-image of being more accommodating to local traditions and intercultural understanding than was Enlightened modernity, Christianity still is made to feel something like the bastard son who shows up uninvited at the annual family picnic. Inside all the talk about multiculturalism, contemporary culture often balks at including Christianity in its “gorgeous mosaic.” This uneasiness has sometimes been dubbed the “ABC Rule,” meaning “anything but Christianity.” Undoubtedly Pascal would amend that to mean “anyone but Christ,” for at root that is where the scandal lies. Christianity’s scandal is not just itself (though it is that as well, which is no doubt why the Pope wants the Church formally to repent of her institutional sins); its real scandal is Jesus Christ. And He is the stumbling block precisely because to accept Him is first of all to admit one’s hopelessness without Him. Pride and life in Christ are inherently incompatible.

Saturday, May 3, 2014

Sometimes you need big words

Pope Francis continues to point out obstacles to true evangelization. He focuses below on some less obvious yet more insidious ways of thinking. I think if we carefully examine our personal practice of the Faith we can see strains of Gnosticism or neopelagianism in ourselves. I had to do a little research to understand these terms. Before getting into the text of Evangelii Gaudium I offer a partial definition of these concepts.

... Gnostics claim to possess an elevated knowledge, a “higher truth” known only to a certain few. Gnosticism comes from the Greek word gnosis which means “to know.” Gnostics claim to possess a higher knowledge, not from the Bible, but acquired on some mystical higher plain of existence. Gnostics see themselves as a privileged class elevated above everybody else by their higher, deeper knowledge of God.
(http://www.gotquestions.org/Christian gnosticism.html#ixzz30drNO2Mz)

"Neopelagianism" ... excludes the necessity of Grace for salvation ...it is individualistic ... it excludes a dependence on God, which is at the heart of Francis' preaching on 'mercy'.... He links the whole phrase [promethean neopelagianism] to those who, 'observe certain rules or remain intransigently faithful to a particular Catholic style from the past' ... I think what he is saying, which the whole of Evangelii Gaudium seems to be saying is that we have be absorbed into the wondrous life-changing joy of the Gospel of Jesus Christ rather than being curators of a museum or experimenters in a laboratory. (see Fr. Ray Blake's Blog at http://marymagdalen.blogspot.com/2013/11/self-absorbed-promethean-neo-pelagianism.html)



No to spiritual worldliness
93. Spiritual worldliness, which hides behind the appearance of piety and even love for the Church, consists in seeking not the Lord’s glory but human glory and personal well-being. It is what the Lord reprimanded the Pharisees for: “How can you believe, who receive glory from one another and do not seek the glory that comes from the only God?” (Jn 5:44). It is a subtle way of seeking one’s “own interests, not those of Jesus Christ” (Phil 2:21). It takes on many forms, depending on the kinds of persons and groups into which it seeps. Since it is based on carefully cultivated appearances, it is not always linked to outward sin; from without, everything appears as it should be....

94. This worldliness can be fuelled in two deeply interrelated ways. One is the attraction of gnosticism, a purely subjective faith whose only interest is a certain experience or a set of ideas and bits of information which are meant to console and enlighten, but which ultimately keep one imprisoned in his or her own thoughts and feelings. The other is the self-absorbed promethean neopelagianism of those who ultimately trust only in their own powers and feel superior to others because they observe certain rules or remain intransigently faithful to a particular Catholic style from the past. A supposed soundness of doctrine or discipline leads instead to a narcissistic and authoritarian elitism, whereby instead of evangelizing, one analyzes and classifies others, and instead of opening the door to grace, one exhausts his or her energies in inspecting and verifying. In neither case is one really concerned about Jesus Christ or others. These are manifestations of an anthropocentric immanentism. It is impossible to think that a genuine evangelizing thrust could emerge from these adulterated forms of Christianity.

95. This insidious worldliness is evident in a number of attitudes which appear opposed, yet all have the same pretence of “taking over the space of the Church”. In some people we see an ostentatious preoccupation for the liturgy, for doctrine and for the Church’s prestige, but without any concern that the Gospel have a real impact on God’s faithful people and the concrete needs of the present time. In this way, the life of the Church turns into a museum piece or something which is the property of a select few. In others, this spiritual worldliness lurks behind a fascination with social and political gain, or pride in their ability to manage practical affairs, or an obsession with programmes of self-help and self-realization. It can also translate into a concern to be seen, into a social life full of appearances, meetings, dinners and receptions. It can also lead to a business mentality, caught up with management, statistics, plans and evaluations whose principal beneficiary is not God’s people but the Church as an institution. The mark of Christ, incarnate, crucified and risen, is not present; closed and elite groups are formed, and no effort is made to go forth and seek out those who are distant or the immense multitudes who thirst for Christ. Evangelical fervour is re- placed by the empty pleasure of complacency and self-indulgence.

96. This way of thinking also feeds the vain glory of those who are content to have a modicum of power and would rather be the general of a defeated army than a mere private in a unit which continues to fight. How often we dream up vast apostolic projects, meticulously planned, just like defeated generals! But this is to deny our history as a Church, which is glorious precisely because it is a history of sacrifice, of hopes and daily struggles, of lives spent in service and fidelity to work, tiring as it may be, for all work is “the sweat of our brow”. Instead, we waste time talking about “what needs to be done” – in Span ish we call this the sin of “habriaqueísmo” – like spiritual masters and pastoral experts who give instructions from on high. We indulge in endless fantasies and we lose contact with the real lives and difficulties of our people.

97. Those who have fallen into this worldliness look on from above and afar, they reject the prophecy of their brothers and sisters, they discredit those who raise questions, they constantly point out the mistakes of others and they are obsessed by appearances. Their hearts are open only to the limited horizon of their own immanence and interests, and as a consequence they neither learn from their sins nor are they genuinely open to forgiveness. This is a tremendous corruption disguised as a good. We need to avoid it by making the Church constantly go out from herself, keeping her mission focused on Jesus Christ, and her commitment to the poor
 God save us from a worldly Church with superficial spiritual and pastoral trappings! This stifling worldliness can only be healed by breathing in the pure air of the Holy Spirit who frees us from self-centredness cloaked in an outward religiosity bereft of God. Let us not allow ourselves to be robbed of the Gospel!

Tuesday, April 29, 2014

Priorities

It’s been another weekend in Chicago. Another slew of shootings and deaths. Is there anyone out there working to find the root causes of this problem? Day after day children commit violence against children, neighbor against neighbor, mothers against their children, teachers against their students and fathers against their families. It is not just in the crime ridden areas of Chicago, but it happens as well in quiet, affluent suburbs.

Popular opinion attributes this problem to the number and kinds of guns owned. This is a somewhat simplistic approach to a solution to this problem. The gun is the delivery vehicle for the violence and not a motivating force for the violence. Fewer guns would produce less violence sounds logical, but, such thinking gives us an enemy to which we can direct our anger while we fail to dig deeper into the root causes of the violence that afflicts us.

We can be certain that human carbon footprints will eventually bring our ecosystem to its knees. Millions of dollars, maybe billions, are spent to reduce levels of atmospheric pollution so that our environment may be slightly better - in a hundred years or so. Our municipalities spend much to protect trees and reduce soil erosion on construction sites all in the name of environmental protection.

Why are we so concerned about the deterioration of our environment in some distant future when here and now we are systematically hating and killing each other? And the only answer we can come up with is fewer guns.

I can offer some suggestions. But, who am I? I’m not a social scientist, nor a psychiatrist, so I can offer no empirical evidence to support my suggestions. I have, however, raised a family and functioned in society to a modestly successful degree. I think these to be enough qualifications to be able to recognize that there is a serious deficiency of love in our relationships with each other.


So please, all you scientists out there who apply such a high level of acumen to the preservation of our environment, turn that passionate desire for preserving our environment toward the preservation our lives. 

Sunday, April 27, 2014

The Community of Saints and saints in community



The Pope's joy in the Gospel and his confidence in his flock to proclaim the Gospel is evident even when he is pointing out our flaws. I had to look up the meaning of the term "immanentism".
I found online a definition given by a French theologian, Father Louis Bouyer, who defines immanentism as follows: “A tendency to understand the immanence of God or of His action in us in such a way that it would, in fact, exclude the reality of His transcendence.” 
http://fssp.com/press/2011/04/immanentism-catholicism-and-religious-experience-by-d-q-mcinerny-ph-d/

The highlight below are mine.

From Evangelii Gaudium


Yes to the new relationships brought by Christ

87. Today, when the networks and means of human communication have made unprecedented advances, we sense the challenge of finding and sharing a “mystique” of living together, of mingling and encounter, of embracing and sup- porting one another, of stepping into this flood tide which, while chaotic, can become a genuine experience of fraternity, a caravan of solidarity, a sacred pilgrimage. Greater possibilities for communication thus turn into greater possibilities for encounter and solidarity for everyone. If we were able to take this route, it would be so good, so soothing, so liberating and hope-filled! To go out of ourselves and to join others is healthy for us. To be self-enclosed is to taste the bitter poison of immanence, and humanity will be worse for every selfish choice we make.


88. The Christian ideal will always be a summons to overcome suspicion, habitual mistrust, fear of losing our privacy, all the defensive attitudes which today’s world imposes on us. Many try to escape from others and take refuge in the comfort of their privacy or in a small circle of close friends, renouncing the realism of the social aspect of the Gospel. For just as some people want a purely spiritual Christ, without flesh and without the cross, they also want their inter-personal relationships provided by sophisticated equipment, by screens and systems which can be turned on and off on command. …. True faith in the incarnate Son of God is inseparable from self-giving, from membership in the community, from service, from reconciliation with others. The Son of God, by becoming flesh, summoned us to the revolution of tenderness.

89. Isolation, which is a version of immanentism, can find expression in a false autonomy which has no place for God. But in the realm of religion it can also take the form of a spiritual consumerism tailored to one’s own unhealthy individualism. …. Today, our challenge is not so much atheism as the need to respond adequately to many people’s thirst for God, lest they try to satisfy it with alienating solutions or with a disembodied Jesus who demands nothing of us with regard to others….

90. Genuine forms of popular religiosity are incarnate, since they are born of the incarnation of Christian faith in popular culture. For this reason they entail a personal relationship, not with vague spiritual energies or powers, but with God, with Christ, with Mary, with the saints. These devotions are fleshy, they have a face. They are capable of fostering relationships and not just enabling escapism. In other parts of our society, we see the growing attraction to various forms of a “spirituality of well-being” divorced from any community life, or to a “theology of prosperity” detached from responsibility for our brothers and sisters, or to depersonalized experiences which are nothing more than a form of self-centredness.


91. One important challenge is to show that the solution will never be found in fleeing from a personal and committed relationship with God which at the same time commits us to serving others. This happens frequently nowadays, as believers seek to hide or keep apart from others or quietly flit from one place to another or from one task to another, without creating deep and stable bonds. “Imaginatio locorum et mutatio multos fefellit”. [ Thomas À Kempis, De Imitatione Christi, Lib. I, IX, 5: “Dreaming of different places, and moving from one to another, has misled many”.] …. We need to help others to realize that the only way is to learn how to encounter others with the right attitude, which is to accept and esteem them as companions along the way, without interior resistance. Better yet, it means learning to find Jesus in the faces of others, in their voices, in their pleas. And learning to suffer in the embrace of the crucified Jesus whenever we are unjustly attacked or meet with ingratitude, never tiring of our decision to live in fraternity.


92. There indeed we find true healing, since the way to relate to others which truly heals instead of debilitating us, is a mystical fraternity, a contemplative fraternity. It is a fraternal love capable of seeing the sacred grandeur of our neighbour, of finding God in every human being, of tolerating the nuisances of life in common by clinging to the love of God, of opening the heart to divine love and seeking the happiness of others just as their heavenly Father does. Here and now, especially where we are a “little flock” (Lk 12:32), the Lord’s disciples are called to live as a community which is the salt of the earth and the light of the world (cf. Mt 5:13-16). We are called to bear witness to a constantly new way of living together in fidelity to the Gospel. Let us not allow ourselves to be robbed of community!

Monday, April 7, 2014

What seems to be the problem?

The Pope sets us up in the first paragraph below, singing praises for all that the Church does. It makes one feel proud. I’m sure that what he means by Church is not just the the Church as institution, but the Church as the people of God. His hopefulness and confidence in the goodness of people shines through his message. This is the quality in our Pope that has endeared him to so many in so short a period of time.

He is not a softie however. The paragraphs that follow, although they do not abandon his hopefulness and confidence, point to cultural flaws that diminish our efforts to bring our world to Jesus. We can see ourselves subject to many of the temptations Pope Francis describes and guilty of many attitudes and modes of thinking uncharacteristic of a Christian.

Pope Francis ends with a big finish in paragraphs 84 – 86. He knows how to work the crowd. He returns to his characteristic faith, hope and confidence by quoting Scripture and Blessed Pope John XXIII. His pastoral approach to the work of the Papal office shows his true leadership qualities and accounts for the growing love for him being expressed by the people of God.

The highlights below have been added by me.


II. Temptations Faced by Pastoral Workers
76. I feel tremendous gratitude to all those who are committed to working in and for the Church. ... Rather, I would like to reflect on the challenges that all of them must face in the context of our current globalized culture. But in justice, I must say first that the contribution of the Church in today’s world is enormous. The pain and the shame we feel at the sins of some members of the Church, and at our own, must never make us forget how many Christians are giving their lives in love. They help so many people to be healed or to die in peace in makeshift hospitals. They are present to those enslaved by different addictions in the poorest places on earth. They devote themselves to the education of children and young people. They take care of the elderly who have been forgotten by everyone else. They look for ways to communicate values in hostile environments. They are dedicated in many other ways to showing an immense love for humanity inspired by the God who became man. I am grateful for the beautiful example given to me by so many Christians who joyfully sacrifice their lives and their time. This witness comforts and sustains me in my own effort to overcome selfishness and to give more fully of myself.

77. … At the same time, I would like to call attention to certain particular temptations which affect pastoral workers.

Yes to the challenge of a missionary spirituality

78. Today we are seeing in many pastoral workers, including consecrated men and women, an inordinate concern for their personal freedom and relaxation …. At the same time, the spiritual life comes to be identified with a few religious exercises which can offer a certain comfort but which do not encourage encounters with others, engagement with the world or a passion for evangelization. As a result, one can observe in many agents of evangelization, even though they pray, a heightened individualism, a crisis of identity and a cooling of fervour.

79. At times our media culture and some intellectual circles convey a marked scepticism with regard to the Church’s message, along with a certain cynicism. As a consequence, many pastoral workers, although they pray, develop a sort of inferiority complex which leads them to relativize or conceal their Christian identity and convictions. This produces a vicious circle. They end up being unhappy with who they are and what they do; they do not identify with their mission of evangelization and this weakens their commitment. They end up stifling the joy of mission with a kind of obsession about being like everyone else and possessing what everyone else possesses. Their work of evangelization thus becomes forced, and they devote little energy and very limited time to it.

80. Pastoral workers can thus fall into a relativism which, whatever their particular style of spirituality or way of thinking, proves even more dangerous than doctrinal relativism. It has to do with the deepest and inmost decisions that shape their way of life. This practical relativism consists in acting as if God did not exist, making decisions as if the poor did not exist, setting goals as if others did not exist, working as if people who have not received the Gospel did not exist. It is striking that even some who clearly have solid doctrinal and spiritual convictions frequently fall into a lifestyle which leads to an attachment to financial security, or to a desire for power or human glory at all cost, rather than giving their lives to others in mission. Let us not allow ourselves to be robbed of missionary enthusiasm!

No to selfishness and spiritual sloth

81. At a time when we most need a missionary dynamism which will bring salt and light to the world, many lay people fear that they may be asked to undertake some apostolic work and they seek to avoid any responsibility that may take away from their free time. For example, it has become very difficult today to find trained parish catechists willing to persevere in this work for some years. Something similar is also happening with priests who are obsessed with protecting their free time. This is frequently due to the fact that people feel an overbearing need to guard their personal freedom, as though the task of evangelization was a dangerous poison rather than a joyful response to God’s love which summons us to mission and makes us fulfilled and productive. Some resist giving themselves over completely to mission and thus end up in a state of paralysis and acedia.
82. The problem is not always an excess of activity, but rather activity undertaken badly, without adequate motivation, without a spirituality which would permeate it and make it pleasurable. As a result, work becomes more tiring than necessary, even leading at times to illness. Far from a content and happy tiredness, this is a tense, burdensome, dissatisfying and, in the end, unbearable fatigue. This pastoral acedia can be caused by a number of things. Some fall into it because they throw themselves into unrealistic projects and are not satisfied simply to do what they reasonably can. Others, because they lack the patience to allow processes to mature; they want everything to fall from heaven. Others, because they are attached to a few projects or vain dreams of success. Others, because they have lost real contact with people and so depersonalize their work that they are more concerned with the road map than with the journey itself. Others fall into acedia because they are unable to wait; they want to dominate the rhythm of life. Today’s obsession with immediate results makes it hard for pastoral workers to tolerate anything that smacks of disagreement, possible failure, criticism, the cross.

83. And so the biggest threat of all gradually takes shape: “the gray pragmatism of the daily life of the Church, in which all appears to proceed normally, while in reality faith is wearing down and degenerating into small-mindedness”. A tomb psychology thus develops and slowly transforms Christians into mummies in a museum. Disillusioned with reality, with the Church and with themselves, they experience a constant temptation to cling to a faint melancholy, lacking in hope, which seizes the heart like “the most precious of the devil’s potions”. Called to radiate light and communicate life, in the end they are caught up in things that generate only darkness and inner weariness, and slowly consume all zeal for the apostolate. For all this, I repeat: Let us not allow ourselves to be robbed of the joy of evangelization!
No to a sterile pessimism

84. The joy of the Gospel is such that it cannot be taken away from us by anyone or anything (cf. Jn 16:22). The evils of our world – and those of the Church – must not be excuses for diminishing our commitment and our fervour. Let us look upon them as challenges which can help us to grow. With the eyes of faith, we can see the light which the Holy Spirit always radiates in the midst of darkness, never forgetting that “where sin increased, grace has abounded all the more” (Rom 5:20). Our faith is challenged to discern how wine can come from water and how wheat can grow in the midst of weeds. Fifty years after the Second Vatican Council, we are distressed by the troubles of our age and far from naive optimism; yet the fact that we are more realistic must not mean that we are any less trusting in the Spirit or less generous. In this sense, we can once again listen to the words of Blessed John XXIII on the memorable day of 11 October 1962: “At times we have to listen, much to our regret, to the voices of people who, though burning with zeal, lack a sense of discretion and measure. In this modern age they can see nothing but prevarication and ruin ... We feel that we must disagree with those prophets of doom who are always forecasting disaster, as though the end of the world were at hand. In our times, divine Providence is leading us to a new order of human relations which, by human effort and even beyond all expectations, are directed to the fulfilment of God’s superior and inscrutable designs, in which everything, even human setbacks, leads to the greater good of the Church”.

85. One of the more serious temptations which stifles boldness and zeal is a defeatism which turns us into querulous and disillusioned pessimists, “sourpusses”. Nobody can go off to battle unless he is fully convinced of victory beforehand. If we start without confidence, we have already lost half the battle and we bury our talents. While painfully aware of our own frailties, we have to march on without giving in, keeping in mind what the Lord said to Saint Paul: “My grace is sufficient for you, for my power is made perfect in weakness” (2 Cor 12:9). Christian triumph is always a cross, yet a cross which is at the same time a victorious banner borne with aggressive tenderness against the assaults of evil. The evil spirit of defeatism is brother to the temptation to separate, before its time, the wheat from the weeds; it is the fruit of an anxious and self-centred lack of trust.

86. In some places a spiritual “desertification” has evidently come about, as the result of attempts by some societies to build without God or to eliminate their Christian roots. In those places “the Christian world is becoming sterile, and it is depleting itself like an overexploited ground, which transforms into a desert”. In other countries, violent opposition to Christianity forces Christians to hide their faith in their own beloved homeland. This is another painful kind of desert. But family and the workplace can also be a parched place where faith nonetheless has to be preserved and communicated. Yet “it is starting from the experience of this desert, from this void, that we can again discover the joy of believing, its vital importance for us men and women. In the desert we rediscover the value of what is essential for living; thus in today’s world there are innumerable signs, often expressed implicitly or negatively, of the thirst for God, for the ultimate meaning of life. And in the desert people of faith are needed who, by the example of their own lives, point out the way to the Promised Land and keep hope alive”. In these situations we are called to be living sources of water from which others can drink. At times, this becomes a heavy cross, but it was from the cross, from his pierced side, that our Lord gave himself to us as a source of living water. Let us not allow ourselves to be robbed of hope!